How have journalists and academics investigated current themes and Essay

How have journalists and academics investigated current themes and issues in the US presidential elections - Essay employmentThis research tells that the Presidential elections in the United States generate plenty of interest both within and outdoors the country. Ascending into the role of a superpower at the culmination of the Second World War, the US immaterial policies have had a significant impact in determining the political and economical success of nations entirely across the globe. In this context, the scholarship, reportage and opinion editorials published in the lead up to the elections can make known the contentious issues and underlying themes. Such a study will help assess the merits and drawbacks of the American antiauthoritarian enterprise, which the rest of this essay endeavors to. An issue that is always at the forefront of American politics is domestic economic policy and more importantly the issues of taxes and their expenditure. In spite of political rhetor ic about America world a classless society, the statistics dont measure up to this claim. As Paul Krugman points out, Thirty years ago we were a relatively middle-class nation. It had not always been thus Gilded Age America was a super unequal society, and it stayed that way through the 1920s. During the 1930s and 40s, however, America experienced the Great Com extortion a drastic narrowing of income gaps, probably as a result of New Deal policies. And the new economic site persisted for more than a generation Strong unions taxes on inherited wealth, corporate profits, and high incomes close state-supported scrutiny of corporate management-- each(prenominal) helped to keep income gaps relatively small.... While Roosevelts New Deal economic and social reforms met with with child(p) success, it remains to be seen how the new President would cope with the Wall Street collapse of late. The historical similarities among the two dont end there. They both come from the Democratic Par ty and as Lichtman points out, piggybacked on a center of change. And change is all the more imperative now than ever before in the stick on Second World War American history. For, irrespective of the fact that the country is the richest in the world, the extreme disparities in standard of living among its demography is a symbol of failed economic policies of previous presidents. According to estimates by the economists doubting Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, based on statistics released by the Congressional Budget Office, between 1973 and 2000 the average real income of the bottom 90 percent of American taxpayers actually fell by 7 percent. Meanwhile, the income of the top 1 percent uprise by 148 percent, the income of the top 0.1 percent rose by 343 percent and the income of the top 0.01 percent rose 599 percent. (Those numbers exclude capital gains, so theyre not an artefact of the stock-market bubble.) The distribution of income in the United States has gone remedy back to Gilded Age levels of inequality (Lichtman, 2008). While these statistics represent the systemic injustices of the American economic system, which all Democratic Party candidates point to in their campaigns, there is also a dedicated conservative press and its team of scholars, who attempt to discredit blatant realities with ideological rationale. A case in point is the conservative think-tank Heritage Foundation, which has published articles supporting the reactionary policies of the Republican Party even as the