Origins of World War 1

September 5, 2011 Origins of origination War 1 par and Contrast During the twentieth century Europe seemed to enjoy a plosive speech sound of peace and progress. But below the surface several forces were at the constitute and would lead Europe into the bulky War. World War 1 was the city manager conflict that do its appearance in the out ontogenesis of the twentieth century. As we read in The origins of the number 1 World War by poignancy Heing and in The Iron Dice World War 1 by trick G. Stoessinger, World War 1 began in 1914 it had many countries touch except not all of them entered at the same time.At the beginning of this state of war there were cardinal sides to choose from. The triple entente that was merge by Great Britain, France and Russia Later called the Allied Powers and also they included Italy. The early(a) Alliance was the Triple Alliance between Germany, Austria-Hungry, and Italy posterior on called the telephone exchange Powers whom instead of Ital y who had join the Allied Powers, Turkey join this alliance. Although both chapters feat to explain the origins of World War 1 they differ in unhomogeneous aspects. In the Reading The origins of the first World War by compassion Henig, it is verbalise that cause of the war was the system.The system that was managed before the war was conformed by master(prenominal) which stands for, Militarism Every country in Europe except for Great Britain had conscription, which means that every men over 18 years sexagenarian should register for the army The conscription plan resulted because as the time was spill by all of the countries in Europe had a great growth in their military index Also they were working on implements of war race, which means that they were developing new arms, the country that was the most benefit was Germany.MAIN also stands for Alliances Alliances were a key concept because the alliances began the conflict in Sarajevo, if it werent because they had a miserly relationship with Germany this conflict would have been local, then Russia and Germany and later on France and Great Britain would had not dispelicipate. at that place would not have been a world war. The third letter in MAIN stands for Imperialism early twentieth century saw a great deal of colonization of Asia and Africa by European powers, from each one trying to colonize this lands.These colonies funded a great part of the ruling countries economies and expansion became necessary and desirable to advance the glory and the riches of each European power. The last concept N stands for Nationalism, which means the identicalness that the government or the rulers created towards their population so they were proud of their country and valued to fight for them. Through out the interpret of The Iron Dice World War 1 by John G. Stoessinger, we atomic number 18 able to measure that it dead explains that the causes of world war 1 were attributed to the people in control.It perfe ctly examples that the lack of self-confidence in the leaders, the wrong perception on their competitor and specially the lack of empathy that was found on personal decisions, not based on facts but fears were the causes of the war. The reading is perfectly stating it in the following reiterate The Kaiser was indeed to blame. His flaw was both moral and political, for his form of loyalty demanded hold beyond himself. It offered up the German nation, and it emboldened the senile monarchy of Austria-Hungary o take back a desperate gamble.What is closer to the truth is that he permitted otherwise to rattle and ultimately use the saber for him(p. 4-5). The lack of self-confidence is give tongue to in the last sentence, he preferred that other people made decisions it also states that he offered up the German nation because Archduke Franz-Ferdinand was a close friend. Between these two chapters we can distinguish that both chapters state that the break of the origins of war was o f Germany.In the wink reading we can see this in the following quote succumbed to a power he had not reckoned with the power of Fate had not been for that, the war would never have started (p. 4) and it is also intelligibly shown on the first reading when it is state that if it werent for Germany who intervene in the conflict of Sarajevo, therefore there wouldnt exist a war. There are not many similarities between these two texts, but disparate perspectives of presenting the information.In these two chapters it is clearly marked that the contrast between each other relies on the justification they give to the origins of war the points of view stated in each chapter are related to antithetic points of view. In the first reading The origins of the first World War by Ruth Henig it is clearly marked that the problem was the system failure. And as it is stated in the second reading The Iron Dice World War 1 by John G. Stoessinger, Mortals made these decisions. They made them in fea r and in trembling, but they made them nonetheless. We can infer that in this reading the ones to blame are the ones that were in control of the country the leaders. Another difference between these two chapters is how the information is managed in the first reading the type of writing is rigorously informative and in the second lecture it is more than like a critique as we can see in the quotes that are stated in paragraphs before. In the second reading it is shown the relationship between leaders in a level where they interacted and send telegrams to each other which it is not shown in the first reading.In conclusion I find more interesting the contrast between these two readings because that is the whole point of floor Specially in the causes (origins) of war can and must be shown from different perspectives. The reading I found more accurate through the reading is The Iron Dice World War 1 by John G. Stoessinger, because in my opinion the ones who have control of the system ar e the mortals, therefore they had in their hands the power to debilitate the system and stop the war from happening. Even if the system (MAIN) went out of control the ones how had the decisions to stop it in there hands where the leaders.