.

Thursday, February 28, 2019

How accurate is the film Gladiator Essay

prizefighter is a wonderful story and won stovepipe Picture in 2000. Even though the word-painting is so hygienic done it does non mean that the story is historically accurate. The movie includes umpteen historically accurate facts ranging from some of the characters to the society of Rome. However, Gladiator is for pure entertainment, and barely like the real gladiator battles, it is for the enjoyment of the viewers. The film added to the cinematic categories such romance and intrigue exclusively at the same time took away(p) from many historical aspects.Even though the movie is on the undivided historically inaccurate there are a few historically accurate details. In Gladiator, the hugeness of the amphitheater is very well and accurately portrayed. The Coliseum is larger then Shea Stadium, and that greatness and grandeur is sh sustain correctly in the film. Also, the movie correctly portrayed the armory of the times. The breastplates were correct and so too were the face masks and some other such battle suits.( http//www.online-shrine.com) The movie shows these true details in rewrite for the viewer to think that the other more amazing parts of the maculation are true. Also, by adding the truths it makes sure that the movie will not see neither phony nor cartoonish.The rea male child Gladiator can not be considered historically accurate is because of the glaring errors in the characters and the emotions and actions of the characters. Firstly, Crowes General Maximus Decimus Meridus is a total fake. He is not a real person nor is he very similar to any one else in history. Maximus is instead a hodgepodge of many other people. The one true person who is alone shown incorrectly is Commodus. Commodus is shown as a grownup that never outgrows his childhood. However, he in fact was not like that at all.In the film Commodus is shown killed is commence because his father believed he wasnt fit to rule. In truth Commodus did not kill his. Historians gene rally agree that, Marcus Aurelius died of the plague in Vienna on March 17, 180 CE (www.nmia.com). It is also untrue that Marcus found his son unfit to rule. He had Commodus named Caesar when he was 5 years old, and named Commodus as his replenishment when he was seventeen. As a Roman father he undoubtedly loved and spoiled his son terribly.Gladiator is not a historically accurate film and is filled with hogwash. The film can not be used to study that time period and can only be used as a great Hollywood film but nothing more. Gladiator deserved all of its accolades because of the film in its own right but not because of the history it used to tell the story.Gladiator 28 Feb. 2004 http//www.online-shrine.com/reviews/gladiator.phpIs Gladiator true 28 Feb. 2004 www.nmia.com/pslock/r_glad.htm

No comments:

Post a Comment