Critical thinking process Essay

Critical conjectureing often involves the creation of alternative plans, solutions, approaches, etc. , thence comparing original with the alternatives. Creative thinking requires some searing military rating during and after the creative phase. Critical thinking depends upon that little known and seldom discussed characteristic of the human being nervous systemself-reflexiveness. Usually it besides depends upon that queer human creation and toolself reflexive spoken communication. Humans not only know or so their environment, they know that they know they bum think about how they think, quantify their evaluations.Languages, too, be belong this self-reflexive characteristic. They enable us to talk about talk, to make statements about statements, to write books about writing books. The self-reflexiveness of language and the human nervous system provide us with an open minded system we commode make statements about statements, indefinitely we rump react to our reactions to our reactions indefinitely. At no point can we say, Thats the last word on the subject or, No further reaction is possible (since, in doing so, we have said more, reacted further).However, believing that we have said the last word whitethorn cut of the self-reflexive process. This open ended, self reflexive system makes it possible for us to conduct scientific research, write poetry, plan enterprises, spin out interwoven tales of fictionor spread rumours, spin webs of delusion and talk ourselves into craziness or war. Which we will do depends in part upon our motivation, but also upon our escorting of the thinking process and some aspects of the working of the nervous system. universal semantics provides a meta-linguistic or second order approach to critical thinking.It enables us to intent self-reflexiveness systematically to monitor on-going evaluations. The principles and devices it provides call attention to either-or and allness statements, to inferences treated as facts, to overgeneralizations, to statements unrestricted in time, to overly-simple statements of causality, etc. The tools work, whatever the order of abstraction, whatever the reference point of the statement (Johnson, 1991).How language empowers or limits the typeface of our thoughts. Along with most of his contemporaries, Blair defines language in terms of a relationship between signs and thoughts Language signifies the expression of our ideas by certain articulate sounds, which be used as the signs of those ideas (cited 198). Elaborating on this interdependence, he asserts that when we are employed in the study of composition, we are cultivating reason itself. True rhetoric and sound logic are precise nearly allied. The study of arranging and expressing our thoughts with propriety, teaches to think, as well as to speak, accurately so close is the connection between thought and the words in which they are clothed (Ulman, 1994). Language can empowers and limit the expression of our thoughts.talking about something that reinforces it, therefore say what you want to be dead on target. Language has power, and by knowing this, you can select words that allow former(a)s to hear and understand you. Certain words provide a way of maintaining the focus of what you want. They can assist you to be in the state of mind that you desire. Looking for irresponsible language patterns, imparts your brain the opportunity to find alternative ways expressing your experiences to yourself and otherwises. These tools come up you off automatic pilot and in control. Having choice means you can regulate how an experience will affect you.You can choose to use your old patterns of expression which produces certain results, or use empowering language to give you opposite results. Now it can be you who decides. Labels limit is another supposition that were dealing with here. When we label something or someone, we put a implication on it that can limit our awareness, experience, an d understanding. Labels are a form of beliefs, and alike all beliefs, they filter our perceptions. Our beliefs only allow us to be intended of things that are in agreement with them, and we unconsciously filter everything else.It can be tremendous evidence of the opposite to penetrate the belief filters. But with detrimental labels, the effects can be very destructive (Kaufman, 1998). The role of critical thinking in persuasion. What is the value of critical thinking? When someone else writes or speaks a peace of reasoning, they are trying to persuade us of something. ruling is an attempt to get us to believe something. People want us to believe things so that we will act in certain ways. carry out requires some effort. There are choices involved. We could be doing something else.Because of this, it is very useful to be able to evaluate reasoning, for some pieces of reasoning should be accepted speckle others should not be accepted. If persuasion occurs in advertising, we coul d be doing many other things with our money. Take buying a car, for example. A lot of money can be involved, so what kind of car to buy can be a pretty big decision. Whether to marry a certain someone or which of a couple of job offers to take are unbosom bigger decisions. Almost every reader will eventually get some serious illness. There may be several different treatments available.Ones comfort, health, even ones life may depend on the decision as to which treatment to undertake. To make these decisions well, we will need to store up our own reasons to support various alternative conclusions. At that time, we could make an paradoxical decision, or a sheep like decision to follow some other persons advice.The values of critical thinking, specifically how to recognize and evaluate reasoning, are the following It help us arrive at true conclusions and therefore it increases our knowledge. It should help us make better decisions. It should help us persuade others and explain truth to them. Contribute to a happier life (Cogan, 1998). References Johnson, K. G. (1991). sentiment creatically a systematic, interdisciplinary approach to creative-critical thinking. Englewood Institute of General Semantics. Kaufman, R. A. (1998). Anatomy of Success. advanced York Ronald A Kaufman. Robert Cogan. (1998). Critical thinking step by step. Boston University hole of America. Ulman, H. L. (1994). Things, thoughts, words, and actions the problem of language in late eighteenth-century British rhetorical theory. new-sprung(prenominal) York SIU Press.