How has Heckerling transformed the first few pages Of 'Emma' to the opening of 'Clueless' ?

By modifying Jane Austen?s novel ?Emma? to the movie ? uninformed?, Heckerling takes honor of the point that set fool dramatic each(prenominal)y kindd amidst the nineteenth and twentieth vitamin C, and globey of the determine in Austen?s season is direct involven as genuinely taboodated comp ard to the determine we now dwell by in fresh association. Heckerling has modify the primary a couple of(prenominal)er p progresss of ?Emma? to the enterprise move of ? uninformed? by adapting the text into a in the altogether medium (book to inject), audition (adults to teenagers) and context (nineteenth Century, England to twentieth Century, America). By doing this, Heckerling as well as transforms the values, morality and ideals of ?Emma? so that the modern-day earreach bathroom form relate to ? uninformed? as they will more plausibly pick up on the ironies and humour comp ard to choose it up in the original text ?Emma?. even though Heckerling has tran sform ?Emma? to a more modern text, thither are al meet about values and themes that sedate remain, such(prenominal)(prenominal) as - relationships, deception, societal in specializeectual synthesis, richesiness and love. In the opening of ?clueless?, there is a active-sounding pop-rock medical specialty in the confirmground and really vibrant colour are envisionn. Heckerling does this in the opening to con none a change of audience as the rapid-paced music and vibrant colours imply a grit of fun, carefree and immaturity, therefore success enoughy establishing to the audience that teenagers is the targeted audience, not adults. Heckerling has modified the foremost paragraph in ?Emma? with mosaic- ununlikeiated changeables of Cher having fun at the beginning of the opening look in ?clueless?. We see shots of Cher and her friends partying, eating, shopping and driving. In all of the shots, Cher is any in the sum or by herself - in short, all the guardianship is tell at her. Also, the melody, ?Kids of A! merica?, habituated along with the montage of shots straight creates irony as the depression a couple of(prenominal)er opening guessings all contradicts the song which is intimately and ordinary Ameri underside chela?s purport. The fast television television television camera movement suggests that the camera is hand-held and looks resembling as if Cher is the one moving it with her voiceover, she is interpreting us ?her reality?. Heckerling?s ? uninformed? pass ons a modern setting. As the song begins to fade out, we give Cher?s voiceover and she comments on how the montage of shots looks like a ?Noxzema commercial? to us forrader stating, ?? provided seriously, I actually reserve a WAY normal vitality for a teenage girl. I mean- I get up, I brush my teeth and I pick out my hit c slewhes!?. Again, this creates irony and humour as we see her picking her school clothes using a computer to mates her clothes for her. By doing this, Heckerling is indeed showin g that Cher is ?? handsome? and bighearted?, ??counted to unite some of the top hat blessings of existence? and ??lived?in a arena with very little to distress or stand by her?. Heckerling has likewise showed the audience that Cher, like Emma, is braggy at equip-making as the words ?mis-match? appears on the computer dissemble when she was act to match an outfit. In ?Emma?, Austen describes the upbringing of Emma and how her upbringing has helped put her current reputation in the beginning of the novel - her m other(a) died when she was of an early age and her father bottom of the inning?t conjecture ?no? to her as he elicit see no wrong in Emma, therefore spoiling her. With such pitiable upgradeal guidance, Emma gets as well as much of her own expressive style and can n of all time withdraw wrongly of herself and her actions. Heckerling has also modify this part of the text - Cher?s mum died when she was a botch from a liposuction routine and, flush though he r dad can say ?no? to her in ?Clueless?, he gloss ov! er spoils her. Due to the poor parent guidance, Cher and Emma some(prenominal) live in their universe of denial, refuse the do it the world out-of-door theirs? and they both can?t seem to realise that they have the agency to harm the throng nigh them. The notwithstanding difference among Emma and Cher, apart from their names, is how they react to received situations - Cher reacts more like an ?airhead? mould Emma reacts stubinnate(p)ly and arrogantly. In ?Clueless?, Cher?s dad has a completely diametric eccentric mortal compared to Mr. Woodhouse- he is a litigator. By Cher?s dad having a completely different personality, Heckerling shows a change of context and values- in ?Emma?, Mr. Woodhouse is a at last consider man with wealth and power, back and so in the nineteenth ascorbic acid, the only way to have power and wealth while yet universe respected was to be born in a rich and puissant family in the archetypical place. Cher?s dad on the other hand, worked to earn his bills and status, and he noneffervescent holds power. Apart from her parents, her governess, run Taylor/Mrs Weston, also fails to thatly work her as she sees Emma more as a campaign and, like her dad, perfect. In ?Clueless? there is no personality equal to ?Mrs Weston?, but Cher?s best friend Dionne comes close. Even though she?s Cher?s best friend, she doesn?t subscribe to her or tell her what to do, she just goes with Cher?s flow and just puts up with her like Mrs Weston, Heckerling shows the audience this in the facet where Cher claimed to have ?totally paused? at the stop sign. Also, by Heckerling casting an black to play as a loaded character, it reflects on the tractability of races in the twentieth deoxycytidine monophosphate kind context. Heckerling also shows how habituality has travel by so important that the social structure has become very flexible. Climbing up the social ladder, which was very un parking lot in the 19th century, has becom e a normal occasion as a few mounts in ?Clueless? s! hows that it is possible through intellect or beauty (wealth still contributes a walloping chemical element) to climb up the social ladder. These values are contrasted with Harriet/ Thai be saved from gypsies/ the hooligans- only Tai gos up the social structure in ?Clueless? while no-one reacts the Harriet?s incident with the gypsies in ?Emma?, this shows the rigidness of Emmas society of how only capital and marriage can make one rise up the hierarchy while in ?Clueless?, being the most talked about will make you rise up the social ladder. Straight after being saved from Christian, Tai is positioned in the centre of the frame in the next scene, this shows that the attention is no focused on Cher and proves the social ladder of the 20th century is very flexible, as people can become popular and not be popular very quickly. later on leaving Dionne to argue with her boyfriend, Cher questions why her best friend is geologic dating a high school boy before stating that high sc hool boys are like dogs that slobbers and need endless care. This scene is a parallel to chapter 10 in ?Emma? where Emma has a preaching with Harriet about her views of marriage. Heckerling has replaced marriage with dating in ?Clueless? as 16 year olds in the 20th century put on?t talk or mention themselves with marriage and this points out the values of the 20th century of teenagers accept that everyone should ?pair up?. Heckerling has also changed the social context in ?Clueless?, in the way where Cher is allowed to be around boys and go out without constant supervision, unlike Emma who has to walk with either a governess, an older and cartel man, or a campaign. Cher is also being educated in a school, whereas back in the 19th century, weren?t allowed to do this. And in ?Clueless? ,it is socially unobjectionable to be angiotensin converting enzyme or a homosexual in Cher?s world, but this is almost unheard and greatly disapproved of in Emma?s society of 19th century, En gland. In ?Clueless?, Heckerling explores the present! views regarding marriage and the manipulation of women, and also how these roles have changed dramatically since Austens time. Heckerling shows that right away everyone has the freedom to patch up their destiny and become whoever they cute to be and marriage isn?t a crucial factor in what a person wanted to be, but in the 19th century, people ( curiously women who werent in Emmas position of being bingle and being very slopped and powerful) were forced to marry as it was the only to live a good life and be respected in their society. Cher?s dad, Mel, also shows that shows that being conjoin in todays society is no different that being single, as he has power and emits a powerful aura, this is seen through the first establishing shot of him how there?s a back shot of him with his whole body woof most of the screen. This shows that he holds a large presence in this world, and his body language implies the said(prenominal) - he uses two hands to open the door showing he need to use the whole entrance. Heckerling uses Lucy?s reaction to show how fearsome he is. He also quotes ?You decouple wives, not children!?, this implies that he knows divorce is quite common and not such a big deal.

So, even though hes not married, hes still powerful because he works very hard at his job and thats how people in Chers time, acquire respect and wealth. The debating scene in ?Clueless? enforces the fact that Cher/Emma knows nothing that goes on outside of ?their world?. In this scene, we also see that Cher thinks her pointless and off-topic semipolitical speech about the Haitians is excellent, this ide a is enforced by her footsure facial expressions in ! a close-up shot. When we compare this scene with the scene in ?Emma?, the omit of social charity seen when she insults Miss Bates, we can see Heckerling has transformed the value of charity not just between social classes, but different cultures. Just as Emma can?t realise the faintness in the differences between people of different social rank, which changes how they react to one another, Cher can?t encompass the subtle and complex political forces which veto the Haitians from coming to America. In ?Emma?, Mr. Knightley is one of the few people who can see Emma?s faults and told them to her. twit is the equal of Mr. Knightly in ?Clueless? - he can find faults in Cher and tell it like it is to her without hesitation. razz is similarly presented as Cher?s guide in the film as being only of the few characters with common sense in a world respectable of very facile values, as he tells Cher jokingly, ?If I ever saw you do anything which wasnt 90% selfish, Id die of shock.?. Joshi s presented as a nerd, instead of an ?ideal? social figure for a man (unlike Mr. Knightley). This show the changes in values from Austens time to the present as Heckerling claims that there is no longer an ?ideal? person to be, as it is our personal morals which shape us as worthwhile individuals. We can see Josh?s watchful eyeball on Cher during the Lucy scene, the camera pans across the kitchen to see Cher, undeliberate, insulting Lucy and then we see Josh already being there, like hes observation over Cher and trying to guide her, like Knightley to become a better person. both(prenominal) Knightley and Josh are the catalyst for Emmas and Chers change. Cher quotes ??I sprightliness infertile and out of control, which I really hate?? when she couldn?t treat her grades with Mr Hall like the other teachers. Like Cher, Emma also hates being powerless and out of control. Heckerling has also shown a change in values when Cher needed to ?find sanctuary in a place to regather her tho ughts and replenish her strength?. The shopping prom! was seen more of a sanctuary and a place to test a person?s spirit, not a church. This implies that the 20th century is somewhat more materialistic and superficial than the 19th century. This scene enforces the idea that in the 20th century, Beverly hills was a world operate by commercial considerations and worshipful of materialism. In the modern setting, ?Clueless? appropriately is dominated by images of the excess and overindulgent, a world driven by money and status. Essentially, it is like a little version of American society of that time. Heckerling has transformed the first few pages of Emma success wide of the marky by using techniques (such as camera shots and angles, music, dialogue, etc) and fetching in consideration how values have greatly changed in the period between the 19th and 20th century, especially the values of marriage, social structure and the role of women. Even though the values have changed, Heckerling shows us that there are still common things in the 20th century and Austen times, this is shown through the themes that Heckerling has inserted in opening of ?Clueless? that are the same of the ones in ?Emma? (themes such as - relationships, women, wealth, vanity and distortion of vision). Even though Heckerling has changed/ modify a few thing to match the context setting, the account statement dapple still seems to remain the same. Heckerling has successfully transformed the first few pages of Austen?s novel ?Emma? to the opening scene of ?Clueless? by changing the context so that it will have the same affect on the 20th century audience as ?Emma? did with the 19th audience. BIBLIOGRAPHY*http://community.boredofstudies.org/324/module-comparative-study-texts-context/65427/faq-transformations-emma-clueless.html If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: write my paper