Miscarriage of Justice Essay -- sensational criminal trials

Arguably three of the most centripetal criminal rivulets in American history are the Commonwealth vs. Borden, atomic number 20 vs. Simpson and Los Angeles vs. Rodney King. All three of these cases received unprecedented amounts of media attention and verdicts from the jury that b solely over the countrified. In my opinion justice, especially social and moral justice, was not achieved in these trials. Social class, race and gender all had a huge tinct on the jurys decisions in apiece of these cases. High priced defense lawyers attorneys were able to place reasonable doubt in the minds of the jurors despite the existent amount of evidence proving the seemingly obvious guilt of Borden, Simpson and the Los Angeles Police department. This newsprint will focus on these criminal trials and the fact that justice or moral rightness was not achieved by the outcome of the jury verdicts.The trial of Lizzie Borden, in June of 1893, captivated the nation. It was covered extensively in n ewspapers throughout the country probably, in part, because it was extremely rare for a woman to commit a horrific act such as the one she was accused of. beingness from a wealthy family that outwardly seemed happy and normal, made it very sticky for people to believe that a woman with her background could be trusty for the bludgeoning death of her father Andrew Borden, a predominate member of town, and her stepmother Abby Borden. The police, however, came to the conclusion that the Bordens murderer must pitch been someone within the home since the digest was otherwise untouched, nothing was missing and there was no sign of all commotion. The only person having both the motive and opportunity to commit these murders was thirty three year old Lizzie Borden.Here are some ambitious fa... ...ing was awarded a 3.8 million dollar settlement. This case, however, will surely haunt the LAPD indefinitely and caused further contention between an already distrusting, leery minority sta te and law enforcement.In conclusion, these extraordinary criminal trials hold their place in history as some of the most palpable miscarriages of justice. In all three cases, it is almost impossible to comprehend the enormity of the evidence convicting each of the defendants. These trials prove that peoples intrinsic preconceived notions regarding the way in which certain people are apt to behave can have more of an influence on an individuals opinion than solid state evidence. I believe the defendants discussed in this paper were guilty of the crimes brought against them. It is a confuse that our court system allows procedure and regulation to take precedence over justice.